A A PSPACE-Complete First Order Fragment of Computability Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
Computability Logic (CoL), introduced by Japaridze in [2003; 2009a], is a research program for developing logic as a formal theory of interactive computability. Formulas in it are understood as (interactive) computational problems and logical operators represent operations on such entities. The goal of this program is to define a systematic way to answer the question “what can be computed?” within the confines of a formal logical system. Computational problems are modelled as logical formulas through the use of game semantics. Each problem is understood as a game played between a machine ⊤ and its environment ⊥, and a problem is seen as computable if there exists a machine that has an algorithmic winning strategy in the corresponding game. The closest predecessors to CoL are Hintikka’s game-theoretic semantics [Hintikka 1996] and Blass’s game semantics for Linear Logic [Blass 1992]. In line with its semantics, CoL introduces a rich set of logical connectives. Among those relevant to this paper are the propositional connectives ¬ (negation), ∨ (parallel disjunction), ∧ (parallel conjunction), ⊔ (choice disjunction) and ⊓ (choice conjunction) as well as the “choice” quantifiers⊔ and⊓. Intuitively, ¬ corresponds to switching the roles of the players ⊤ and ⊥ in game to which it is applied: the game ¬A is obtained from A by turning ⊤’s legal moves and wins into legal moves and wins for ⊥ and vice
منابع مشابه
A PSPACE-complete Fragment of Second-order Linear Logic
Existentially quantified variables are the source of non-decidability for second-order linear logic without exponentials (MALL2). We present a decision procedure for a fragment of MALL2 based on a canonical instantiation of these variables and using inference permutability in proofs. We also establish that this fragment is PSPACE-complete. @ 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. Ail rights reserved.
متن کاملPropositional Logics Complexity and the Sub-Formula Property
In 1979 Richard Statman proved, using proof-theory, that the purely implicational fragment of Intuitionistic Logic (M→) is PSPACE-complete. He showed a polynomialy bounded translation from full Intuitionistic Propositional Logic into its implicational fragment. By the PSPACEcompleteness of S4, proved by Ladner, and the Gödel translation from S4 into Intuitionistic Logic, the PSPACE-completeness...
متن کاملContainment for Conditional Tree Patterns
A Conditional Tree Pattern (CTP) expands an XML tree pattern with labels attached to the descendant edges. These labels can be XML element names or Boolean CTP’s. The meaning of a descendant edge labelled by A and ending in a node labelled by B is a path of child steps ending in a B node such that all intermediate nodes are A nodes. In effect this expresses the until B, A holds construction fro...
متن کاملOpen problems in computability logic
1. Remark 7 of [6] claims that the cirquent calculus system CL5 without duplication has polynomial size proofs (every provable formula F has a proof whose size is polynomial in the size of F ). Verify this claim. What kind of a polynomial do we have here? Does such a system have any reasonable semantics? 2. Consider the system CCC from [6] but without the Weakening rule. Does it have an interes...
متن کاملSatisfiability of the Two-Variable Fragment of First-Order Logic over Trees
We consider the satisfiability problem for the two-variable fragment of first-order logic over finite unranked trees. We work with signatures consisting of some unary predicates and the binary navigational predicates ↓ (child), → (right sibling), and their respective transitive closures ↓+, → . We prove that the satisfiability problem for the logic containing all these predicates, FO[↓, ↓+,→,→ ...
متن کامل